The Derek Chauvin Question

In this post I want to address a specific question concerning "Derek Chavin", who is alleged to be the Minneapolis cop who "murdered" "George Floyd" by putting his foot on Floyd's neck until he was dead.  Anyone who pays attention to the MSM knows the official story of the George Floyd alleged murder but there is something very wrong with this official story.  I contend that the entire affair was nothing but a PSYOP and that as such, nothing about the official story can be trusted to be the truth.  I have not wanted to investigate too deeply into this because I do not care much about it.  To me, its a slam dunk that it was a PSYOP and that the BLM protests that it generated were part of this PSYOP, but not all of the readers of this Blog appear to think so.  What I want to address in this post is whether the man who the MSM tells us was Derek Chauvin when he allegedly killed George Floyd is the same man who the MSM tells us was later arrested for the alleged murder.  See the below images.

The Derek Chauvin who allegedly killed George Floyd:

The Derek Chauvin who allegedly was arrested for killing George Floyd:

I contend that the two images above do not show the same person but show two different people of somewhat similar appearance.  The first image shows someone older than the second image, with a much more oval shaped face.  The second image shows someone younger than the first image, with a much more rounded face.  

In this post I am going to look into this deeper to discover what the truth is concerning these two images and also the entire George Floyd PYSOP which this is part of.

First of all, I contend that the entire George Floyd murder was a PSYOP that never happened in reality, in the very same way as the Sandy Hook School shooting was a PSYOP that never happened in reality.  The various people playing roles in the PSYOP are not who they appear to be.  In the case of Chauvin, I claim he is an identity who has been created specifically for this PSYOP and not a real person in the same way as Adam Lanza was a created identity for the Sandy Hook School shooting PSYOP and not a real person.  In other words, Derek Chauvin does not exist but is only a role in a PSYOP.  He was not a Minneapolis MI police officer.  I contend that the man in the first image shown above is just an actor wearing what looks like a Minneapolis MI police officer's uniform while not being a genuine cop.

Here is a list of discrepancies between the man shown in that image and a real Minneapolis MI police officer:

Badge is on crooked. He has no name tag- see real Minneapolis cop. Has no radio backup on shirt. He’s unshaven. His demeanor is far less professional than that of a rookie in police academy, and certainly not a 20-year police veteran. 

Below are images of real Minneapolis MI police officers.  Please compare them to the first image to see the obvious discrepancies.

Compare those images to the man we are told is "Derek Chauvin" below.  Note Sketchy crooked badge, no name tag, no radio, unshaven.

Because Derek Chauvin is not a real person but merely a role in a PSYOP, he does not have to be played by the same person.  All this is required is that the people playing the role look somewhat alike and the general public who are gullible and stupid and believe whatever they are told is the truth by the MSM will never notice the difference.  This explains better than anything else why two completely different but similar looking people are playing this role, one person during the killing of Floyd and a different person being arrested for the killing.  Yes, they are playing games with us.  Its all about perception and not about truth. 

And now we turn our attention from Derek Chauvin to George Floyd and ask the question, If Derek Chauvin is not a real person but just a role in a PSYOP then was "George Floyd" a real person or was he too just a role in a PSYOP?  I do not know the answer to this question.  He may be a false identity created specifically for this PSYOP OR he may have been a real person who died under completely different circumstances (such as dying from a drug overdose or being murdered) and then a PSYOP was created around him and his death.  Whether he was a real person or not, the circumstances of his death as described by the Main Stream Media are not true and, just like in the case of Derek Chauvin, two completely different people of similar appearance played the role of George Floyd.  

The George Floyd before the "murder":

The George Floyd during the "murder":

Here is a great link to exposing the lie of the George Floyd murder for your reference:

https://web.archive.org/web/20200605083502/http://chrisspivey.org/think-floyd/

The information released to the public about Floyd and Chauvin is not real but is simply disinformation to support the PSYOP.

More to Come

A list of cult families associated in some way with the JonBenet Ramsey murder

In the previous post I described what a cult family is and how new cult families are arranged to come into existence to keep the cult going from one generation after another.  I also said that there is often a close secret connection between these families so that they assist each other and they secretly work together as a network to accomplish goals important to the cult to which they all belong.  

I contend that there were many such cult families involved in some way in the death of JonBenet Ramsey and the later cover up of it.  In this post I want to start a list of all the families I see as being in any way related to the death of JonBenet and what that involvement entails.  Use this as a list of real world examples of cult families to gain better understanding of them and to see how they all work together in secret and aid each other.  

John Bennett Ramsey's second family whose daughter was killed by another member of the cult, either during sexual abuse or during a cult ritual:

John Bennett Ramsey's first family whose oldest daughter Beth was murdered by the cult to silence her when she started recalling memories of childhood Satanic ritual abuse.

Fleet White Jr. Family, including Priscilla White and Daphne White:

The relationship of this family to John Bennett Ramsey's second family is through John Ramsey knowing and being associated with Fleet White Jr. and Fleet White Sr. in Southern California before John Ramsey even met Patsy. Fleet White Jr. attended the 1980 wedding of John and Patsy Ramsey in Atlanta, GA because Fleet White Jr. was good friends with John Ramsey before 1980 in Southern California.  This cult family has significant involvement in the death of JonBenet Ramsey.  All members of this family were present at the secret location where JonBenet Ramsey was killed and they all witnessed her death.  The daughter of this family, Daphne White, was sexually abused at the same location where JonBenet was also sexually abused and then killed.  

Fleet White Sr. family including Nyla White, Fleet White Jr. and Lani White.

Nancy Krebs accused Fleet White Sr. of being the true murderer of JonBenet Ramsey who was assisted by his son, Fleet White Jr.  Fleet White Sr., Fleet White Jr. and Nyla White were all present at the secret location where JonBenet was killed in 1996.  Fleet White Sr. was a high ranking member of the cult in Southern California.  John Ramsey had a secret hidden history with both Fleet White Sr. and Fleet White Jr. in Southern California.  Although Fleet White Sr. was a well known personality in the Los Angles area from the 1960's onward, there are no pictures of this man on the internet because the cult has purposely scrubbed most information about this man to hide his involvement in the JonBenet Ramsey death.  Lani White was not at the location where JonBenet was killed.

Family of Don, Gwen, Nancy and Shirley Krebs

Fleet White Sr. sexually abused Nancy Krebs when she was around 4 years old in Southern California.  John Ramsey also sexually abused Nancy Krebs around this same time.  Fleet White Jr. also sexually abused Nancy Krebs.  The daughter of Shirley Krebs was at the same party where JonBenet met her death and was a first hand witness to that death. Gwen Krebs was also at the same location where JonBenet Ramsey died and is a first hand witness to the death.  Nancy Krebs was a second hand witness to the death who became aware of it and who really did it through other members of her family and also from Nyla White, who was a close friend of Nancy's grandmother.  

Family of Shirley Krebs, names of her husband, son and daughter unknown.

Shirley Krebs' then five year old daughter was at the same party where JonBenet Ramsey met her death and was a firsthand witness to it.  Shirley was aware that her daughter was going to be sexually abused at this party and she gave her consent to it.  

The following family tree may be helpful in understanding some of the relationships between these cult families, especially in Southern California.

https://web.archive.org/web/20021212174745/holoworld.com/ramseyreports/FamilyTree.jpg

More to Come

What was the death of JonBenet Ramsey really about?

Here is my answer to that question in a single sentence:

It was an incident that was not intended to happen that threatened to expose a hidden world that most people are supposed to know nothing about.  

I have discussed the Two Worlds Paradigm extensively on this Blog and this case is a very telling demonstration of it.  There is a False world or false reality that the general public is supposed to believe in and the public is not supposed to even suspect that there could be anything beyond this.  In other words, its supposed to be inconceivable to the general public that there could be anything else which describes world events other than the world they have been conditioned to believe in.  The death of JonBenet Ramsey threatened to expose a secret real world to the public that the public is never supposed to see or even suspect.  Consider it an anomaly that was never intended but when viewed properly it does expose a hidden real world to public scrutiny and that is what all of my posts about the JonBenet Ramsey death have been about.  In this post I want to step back and summarize what I have learned about the secret real world from a careful examination of this case.  

What I am about to describe is a hidden subculture that exists in our society that most people know nothing about because its existence has been completely hidden from most.  I don't know the best way to address this but please bear with me while I do my best to describe this hidden subculture.

It involves Satanism.  It is a Satanic cult on a world wide level that has many branches.  Each branch is autonomous but is also part of the whole.  Some of the branches are in Europe and there is also an American branch. Some people may refer to this Satanic cult as the Illuminati but I prefer not to use that term since it has many connotations.  In this document I will refer to it simply as the cult. 

Secrecy is extremely important to the cult since its involved in a lot of very illegal activities and its exposure or the exposure of its members could lead to the destruction of the entire cult.  Secrecy is more important than anything else to them because without secrecy they cannot exist in society.  The first rule of the cult is that you never talk about the cult with outsiders.  

The cult is made up of families, where the entire family including the kids are cult members.  When the kids of that family grow up then they become members of other cult families.  Male children of cult families grow up to start their own cult families.  It is arranged for female members of cult families to become married to male members of other cult families. These are not normal marriages based upon love and romance but specially arranged marriages between cult raised children so that they will form a family that will continue the cult traditions and practices.  The Freemason organizations called Rainbow Girls and Job's Daughters are behind the arranged marriages of females from one cult family to males from another cult family so that they form an entirely new cult family. It is the cult that is the most important thing in these families so the cult practices get passed down from one generation to another.  Its all about perpetuating the existence of the cult from one generation to another.

The Ramsey family as an example of a cult family:

I contend that the Ramsey family was not a normal family but one of these cult families that I described in the previous paragraph and that the following is true about it:

All four Ramsey's including the kids were members of the cult.

Patsy Ramsey's original family since she was a child (the Paugh family) was also a cult family.

John Ramsey's family since he was a child was also a cult family.  As a son from a previous cult family, John Ramsey started his own cult family.

Patsy Paugh's relationship and later marriage to John Ramsey was arranged through the Freemason Rainbow Girls and Job's Daughters organizations.  It was not a normal marriage based on love but about carrying on the traditions of the cult.

Once John and Patsy Ramsey had kids, then their kids were used in cult activities.

Cult Families have a much closer relationship to each other than normal non cult families.  While this close relationship is often hidden to protect the security of the cult and to keep outsiders from knowing about it, these families which may be totally unrelated by blood are all part of the same network because they are members of the same cult.  For example, many seemingly unrelated families in a town like Boulder CO may have a secret alliance and all work together in secret to achieve a cult goal or to protect the secrecy of the cult when that secrecy has been threatened.  Even cult families that live in different states can be associated with each other through the cult, so they can work with each other and help each other.  The cult is a network of such families working together to accomplish cult goals.

Incest is rampant within these cult families, much more so than in normal non cult families.  Within the cult, incest between family members is the norm, just like pedophilia is the norm.  It is the incest within the family that leads to the pedophilia outside of the family. 

In this secret subculture, child sexual abuse is common place but its not called abuse there. Its the norm.  Pedophilia is the norm. Many pedophiles in that culture abuse children on a regular basis for pleasure. Pedophilia may be disguised as cult "religious" rituals, i.e. SRA (Satanic Ritual Abuse)  Children are also used as blackmail tools to entice and entrap men outside the cult in order to control them.  

To maintain secrecy, the cult often uses the young children of cult members to be used for abuse of pedophile cult members.  The reason for this is because it is easiest to control these children and to ensure that they never disclose any activities with other cult members.  It is the cult member parents of the children who ensure that the child not only does what the other cult members want but also never discloses anything.  This arrangement is best for maintaining secrecy of pedophile activities within the cult.  Pedophile activity starts with incest within the family of the child from a young age.  Usually the father abuses the daughter which is training the daughter for activities with cult members outside the family.  The mother may abuse the son.  Then other relatives abuse the child, such as Uncles, Aunts and grandparents.  All of this conditions the child for abuse.  Later the abuse of the child expands to cult members outside of the child's family but everyone who abuses the child is a cult member.  Everything happens within the cult as much as possible to maintain the all important secrecy.  What happens inside the cult stays within the cult and never goes outside of it.

Males and females are treated differently in the cult culture.  It is usually the male who is the dominant one and makes the decisions within the family.  Females in the cult are usually in a supportive role and are expected to follow what the male members want. It is very common for female members of the cult to be sexually abused as children first by their fathers and other male relatives of their family and then later by other members of the cult who wanted to use them.  It is much less common for males to be sexually abused but sometimes a male child will be sexually abused by female members of the cult, usually within his own family. For example, a boy in a cult family may be abused by his mother and his aunt(s) and his grandmother(s).

Mothers of children in these cult families who were once sexually abused by other cult members when they were children train their daughters as they were previously trained. For example, a cult mother knows her daughter is being sexually abused by her husband, other family members and people outside the cult.  The cult mother is expected to keep silent about the abuse and to never reveal it to anyone outside the cult.  The cult mother is expected to train her daughter to keep silent about the abuse and to never disclose it to anyone outside the cult.  The cult mother is expected to assist her husband, other male relatives in the family and cult members outside the family to abuse her daughter.  That is the role that she is expected to fulfill within the cult family. 

Patsy Ramsey as an example of a cult mother:

I contend that Patsy Ramsey was a cult mother, and that the following is true about her:

She came from a cult family where she experienced child sexual abuse at the hands of her father (Donald Paugh) and other male relatives and very possible other cult members outside her immediate family.

She was fully aware that her daughter was being abused by her father (John Ramsey), by other members of the family and by other cult members outside the family.  She allowed this abuse and kept silent about it because she had been conditioned to do so.  She assisted her husband and other male relatives and other cult members in abusing her daughter because that was what she was expected to do in the cult culture.  

She helped train her daughter never to disclose the sexual abuse to anyone outside the cult.

Patsy Ramsey never said anything at all about the cult even after her daughter who she did love very much was killed during a cult activity.  She never betrayed the cult.  She protected the cult and the true killer of her daughter (who she knew) to her death, just as she had been trained to do.  

More to Come

The Key to understanding the True Location of the JonBenet Ramsey murder

As an independent investigator of the JonBenet Ramsey murder and what really happened, one of the big mysteries to me has always been the location of the murder.  I have been all over the board in terms where the murder took place including:

The relatively small home allegedly owned by Fleet White Jr. and Priscilla White in Boulder, CO in 1996.

A mansion owned by Fleet White Jr. and Priscilla White in Boulder CO that has been hidden from the public.

A mansion owned by Fleet White Sr. in Boulder CO that has been hidden from the public.

On the grounds of St. John's Episcopal Church in Boulder, CO.

An unknown location either in or in the vicinity of (within driving distance of) Boulder CO.

Although I am one hundred percent certain it did not occur inside the Ramsey home as we are expected to believe, I have never been satisfied that I know where it took place.  The answer to the question of where JonBenet Ramsey met her untimely death at age six has always eluded me.  Here is an earlier post of mine where I discuss my uncertainty about the location of her death:

https://strangerinajewishworld.blogspot.com/2020/10/location-of-christmas-night-sex-party.html

In this post I want to reexamine the question of where did JonBenet Ramsey really die, the answer to which will lead to other answers about this still mysterious murder.  

What I have concluded in my research is that there has been a massive cover up of the truth in this case to hide both the true perpetrators of the murder and the also to hide the true circumstances that led to the murder.  Changing the location where the murder took place to the Ramsey home and staging a false crime scene there is a major component of the cover up.  In a massive cover up involving a lot of people such as this, there is always a huge amount of disinformation both to support a false cover story and also to hide the circumstances of what really happened.  Disinformation agents abound to tell the public what those behind the cover up want the public to believe. What this means is that most of the people who have provided information about this case cannot be trusted.  Even if their story sounds very convincing, they cannot be trusted not to be someone purposely providing disinformation to support a lie and to conceal the truth.  Please understand this before I continue.  

First of all, we don't know where the four Ramsey's were on Christmas day, 1996.  What the official story wants us to believe is that they were all at a Christmas Party at the relatively small home of Fleet White Jr and Priscilla White.  I used to have a picture of Fleet White Jr. and Priscilla walking in front of that home which I can no longer seem to find but it was not a large home by any means. It was not a mansion. It was not even as large as the Ramsey home in Boulder in 1996.  It was just a mid sized ranch style home.  What we are led to believe is that Fleet White Jr. and Priscilla lived in this (small) home and that they held a Christmas party there for friends and family.  We are led to believe that this the location where the four Ramsey's were on Christmas day 1996 but I contend that this is not the truth.  I contend that Fleet White Jr. and Priscilla and the four Ramsey's were together that day but in a completely different location that has been concealed from the public as part of the above mentioned cover up.  

During the extensive questioning of Burke Ramsey he mentioned something that I have always found extremely odd and that did not fit with any of the other supposed "facts" about this case, which is that on the day of the Christmas Party he had been shocked by an electric fence.  Most people who look at the JBR murder today don't know anything about this.  Burke saying this has been conveniently memory holed, if you know what term means, but he definitely did say it and after looking at everything I know about the case, this is a big key to understanding the location of the murder.  Allow me to explain.

Unlike the many people who came forward to tell lies, I believe that Burke Ramsey told the truth when he said he was shocked by an electric fence and this information got out, although it was never given any importance in the official investigation.  But it is supremely important if one wants to understand the truth.  Why would an electric fence be used and where would it be used?

An electric fence is used for security purposes. An electric fence would surround a secure area for the purpose of either keeping people inside the area or for keeping outsiders from going into the secure area.   

For example, a military base might be surrounded by an electric fence to keep outsiders out.  Another example is a secure compound where an electric fence is used to keep outsiders out. An electric fence could be used to maintain secrecy about activities happening inside the secure area that outsiders were forbidden to see.  As I was contemplating this I made a connection to information provided by a person who calls themselves an escapee from a Satanic cult who calls herself Svali.  I remember reading in the information provided by Svali that the Satanic cult she described used secret areas surrounded by electric fences to keep outsiders from knowing cult activities that went on inside the secure areas.  I am now going to find that reference and reproduce here so you can see just what I am talking about and so you will understand why I made the connection to this case.  

If you have never heard of Svali before, here is a good link to a PDF file that talks about her and the information she said was true about the cult she was part of before she left it.

https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_societies/svali_speaks_book.pdf

If you have been following my other posts about the JonBenet Ramsey murder such as this one, you know that I identify members of a Satanic cult as being behind this murder. It is my belief that the cult that Nancy Krebs described and the cult that Svali is describing in the above document are one and the same.

Below are various excerpts from the above document that I want to use to illustrate a link between the so called Illuminati and the JonBenet Ramsey murder.

The Illuminati have groups in every major city of the United States.  Major U.S. cities include Los Angeles, CA and Denver, CO,  which is less than an hour's driving time from Boulder, CO even taking the slow route.  Click on the below image.

There are 18 cities across the US which are considered major "power centers" for Illuminati power and/or influence. These include Ann Arbor, Michigan and Los Angeles, California and Atlanta, Georgia.  The father of John Ramsey (James Dudley Ramsey) held an important position in Michigan where he was head of the aeronautics commission for the entire State.  James Ramsey held that position during the infamous North Fox Island child abuse/pornography network of the 1970's where it is alleged by many people including myself that Ramsey at the very least gave cover to what was happening on North Fox Island.  I allege that a Satanic cult was behind North Fox Island and that James Dudley Ramsey was a part of this same cult which is the reason he covered for it.  I and others have referred to this as a "pedophile ring" but I say that it is really a Satanic cult.  The pedophile ring and the Satanic cult are one and the same.   Its more accurate to call it a Satanic cult since its activities go far beyond pedophilia to corruption of every imaginable kind.  Note that John and Patsy Ramsey owned a home in Charlevoix, MI which is actually very close to North Fox Island.  

Los Angeles, California is where Fleet White Sr. was a well known personality who owned a Los Angeles based oil company named Fleet Oil Company.  Fleet White Sr. was involved in child sexual abuse for decades in the Los Angeles area from the 1960's onward according to Nancy Krebs.  

And then there is Atlanta, GA, which is also has a JBR murder connection.  John and Patsy Ramsey owned a home there.  John and Patsy Ramsey were married in Atlanta.  

One thing that I would like to emphasize is the fact that the Illuminati today are generational.  There are members who are born into the group.

Pornography:  The Illuminati are linked in many cities with pornography/prostitution/child prostitution/ and white slavery sales.  I contend that JonBenet Ramsey was being used for both child pornography and child prostitution but only to other members of the cult who could be trusted to keep everything in secret.  I contend that a large volume of child pornography concerning JonBenet Ramsey exists today in private collections including the video of her death.  The reasons behind using beautiful children such as JonBenet in such activities are many including making money and power and influence by offering her "services" as a gift to other people in exchange for favorable decisions affecting her father.  For example, I contend that the real reason that John Ramsey's company, Access Graphics, became so successful is because he was using his daughter as leverage to get ahead financially by allowing other powerful members of the cult to abuse her in exchange for helping Access Graphics succeed.

I am jumping way ahead of myself here but I want to describe an insight that came to me pretty strongly for the first time ever as I was thinking about this. Its like a lot of seemingly unrelated dots connected themselves in my mind for the first time and I understood this, like an epiphany.   And the insight I had is that the death of JonBenet Ramsey did not take place in Boulder, CO at all but instead it took place in Denver, CO which is less than hour's drive from Boulder.  I will explain the reasons behind this but for now consider it a working hypothesis that the murder happened either in Denver or the surrounding area of Denver.  The hypothesis is that the Ramsey's were invited/instructed to go to a secret location in or around Denver on Christmas day.  On Christmas morning they drove from Boulder, CO to this location which took them less than an hour to get there.  The Christmas day party happened at this location.  Later that night, JonBenet Ramsey met her death in this very same unknown location. 

Shirley Krebs, who is the younger sister of Nancy Krebs, lived in Arvada, CO which is very close to Denver Colorado where Shirley was employed in December of 1996.  As you can see from the following map, the drive between Denver CO and Arvada CO is a mere twenty minutes.

Shirley has a daughter who was aged five and who was living with her in Arvada, CO in December of 1996. Gwen Krebs, who is the mother of both Nancy Krebs and Shirley Krebs, flew from Southern California where she lived to Arvada, Colorado in 1996 shortly before Christmas day for the purpose of bringing her five year old granddaughter to the same location where JonBenet Ramsey died.  This girl whose name is still unknown was a witness to the death of JonBenet Ramsey when it occurred in this undisclosed location. 

I made the assumption before that Gwen and her granddaughter traveled to Fleet White Jr.'s house in Boulder but I do not believe this now.  What I think now is that the location where Gwen brought her granddaughter and where John and Patsy Ramsey brought JonBenet was in or around Denver.  And this leads to another very pertinent question which the astute follower of this saga must ask.  Was the sex party held on December 25, 1996 in this undisclosed location the first time this five year old girl had been sexually abused or had she been abused previously?  And the answer I come up with is that this was certainly not the first time the girl had been sexually abused.  She had been abused perhaps many times from a younger age and by the time of this party (December 1996) she knew exactly what was going to happen at this party since she had experienced it before.  What she did not know and what she did not expect is that another child being sexually abused at this party was going to die.  But the real point I am trying to make is that this girl had been sexually abused before, possibly in this same location or in different locations in the Denver region where she and her mother lived. She very likely was being prostituted by her mother to other members of the Cult just as Shirley and Nancy had been prostituted by their mother (Gwen) to other members of the Cult when they were around that same age.  The location where the girl was abused on the night of December 25, 1996 could have been a place where she had been abused previously or this could have been the very first time she was there.  

More to Come

The Case of Fleet White Sr.

In a previous post I discussed the cases of two corrupt minions of the secret World Establishment (Nicolas Sarkozy and Jeffrey Epstein) who were not protected from going to jail when their corrupt activities came to the attention of the general public.  There is a similarity to both of these cases:

1)  Both men were loyal willing minions of the secret world establishment.

2)  Both men were corrupt and it was this corruption that made them minions of the secret world establishment in the first place.  The secret world establishment itself is all about corruption so it seeks out corrupt individuals to be minions of it.

3)  The corrupt activities of these individuals came to the attention of the general public and caused an anger in the general public and a demand that these individuals be punished to satisfy justice.  

4)  It was the public's demand for punishment that led to the prosecution of these individuals and not because of justice.  In other words, these men were prosecuted to please the mob and to maintain the illusion that society itself is not corrupt and that those in power care about justice (when in reality that is not the case).

5)  The secret world establishment did not protect either of these individuals because they were minions who had served their main purpose already and were not of great value to the establishment.  The Establishment could afford to lose them and had no real reason to protect them.   As long as the prosecution focused on the corruption of the individuals and did not attempt to go beyond them then the Establishment does not care. 

Fleet White Sr. was another corrupt individual whose criminal behavior came to the attention of the public in December 1996 who was protected by the Establishment and not allowed to be prosecuted for his behavior, unlike Sarkozy and Epstein.  Why was Fleet White treated differently by the Establishment?  For two reasons.

Reason one.  Fleet White Sr. was not just a minion of the hidden Establishment but a powerful member of it.  While a minion can be discarded, a power player like Fleet White Sr. cannot be discarded because he is seen as important.

Reason two.  His prosecution could not have been limited to himself as an individual.  The nature of his crimes were such that any investigation into him and his activities would have exposed a lot of other people in the hidden Establishment, which could never be allowed. 

For these reasons the Establishment stepped in to protect Fleet White when he got in trouble in December of 1996 and completely covered up any evidence of his involvement in the death of six year old JonBenet Ramsey.  

Most people have no idea who Fleet White Sr. is but after researching the man extensively here is my assessment of who Fleet White Sr. (now deceased) was:

1.  He was a well known figure in Southern California especially in Los Angeles.  He was so well known that people could just say his name in a newspaper article or in a radio or television broadcast and he would be known from that without having to say who he was.  In other words, he was a person who would be recognized just by saying his name.

2.  He was an ex Hollywood movie star who starred in two different films in 1948.

3.  He was a Satanist and a high ranking member of a world wide Satanic cult (which some people refer to as the Illuminati) that has branches in Southern California and in Denver Colorado.

4.  He was corrupt and evil.  

5.  He was a pedophile who had sexually abused young children from the 1960's onward.

6.  He had an enormous appetite for wealth, power, sex, control and fame. 

7.  He was very ambitious.

8.  He was intelligent.

9. He was influential.

10.  He was well connected to other power players both in California and across the U.S.

11.  He had a son who shared the corrupt and evil nature of his father but did not share the intelligence and ambition of his father.  

12.  He owned an influential oil and gas company in Southern California named Fleet Oil Company.

13.  He was known to hang out with celebrities in a social setting, for example with Goldie Hawn and Sting.

14.  He and his wife (Nyla White) were known for throwing big parties with up to 200 guests in attendance.

More to Come

 

Congratulations to Texas Governor Abbot for doing the right thing...finally.

You won't often find me saying anything good about a U.S. Politician but in the case of Texas Governor Abbot I make an exception and the reason is because of this news which I just learned today.

Texas is ending its mask mandate and will allow all businesses to fully reopen.

From this article:

Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas said on Tuesday that he was ending his statewide mask mandate, effective March 10, and that all businesses in the state could then operate with no capacity limits. “It is now time to open Texas 100 percent,” he said.

I am actually very surprised to see this as I did not expect to see such a thing for a long time within the USA.  I suspect that this decision by Abbot has a lot to do with the recent ice storm in Texas and the very poor response of the state government to address it and the huge price gouging of customers by the Texas power authority.  I think that caused a huge amount of anger and disgust at Texas state officials and there was a concern that citizens of Texans were going to drive the current state leadership out of office.  So that is at least one reason that comes to my mind for this decision, which was to appease the growing anger of the citizens toward the government.  Better to loosen the authoritarian grip on the citizens than to risk that the citizens will rise up in open rebellion against the government.  Texas citizens were tired of the Bullshit and were not going to take anymore.  Texas state officials recognized this and this decision by Abbot is the response.  To me this explains why this is happening in Texas.  Whatever the motivation behind this decision, I applaud it and I certainly hope that Texas follows through on it.  After month and month of a never ending stream of bad news about the "pandemic", this is certainly breath of fresh air that things might be returning to normal in Texas. 

It is my prediction that those who are behind the plandemic are not going to be pleased with this decision.  Their goal is to get every person on the planet injected and Covid 19 is the justification for the injections.  If things go back to normal in Texas it will set a very bad precedent.  Other states follow the example of Texas and also go back to normal.  This seriously threatens the long term plans of the people behind the plandemic and you can be sure that there will be a response to it.  What I am already predicting loud and clear is that something will happen which will force Texas back into wearing masks and closing businesses, etc.  I am not trying to be doom and gloom in saying this but I am very aware of the way the people behind the plandemic operate.  They do not allow anything to get in the way of what they want.  If an obstacle appears to their plans then they find a way to remove that obstacle. 

I have been watching these people for many years and this has allowed me to think like them well enough to predict how they might respond to this decision that clearly threatens their carefully planned global immunization scheme.  I want to make very clear that this is not what I want to happen by any means. My only desire is for the world to go back to the way it was before the plandemic showed its ugly face.  But I can already predict that a new variant of Covid 19 will suddenly appear that is deadlier than its predecessors that will force Texas to reverse its decision.  These people will develop this virus in labs (or they have already developed it as a contingency plan) and will release it and the MSM will report it.  Just watch to see if this happens.  I could be wrong but I have been watching these people long enough to predict this will be their response.  They are completely dishonest and will do anything to achieve their goals. Human life means nothing to them.  Suffering means nothing to them.  Their plans and agendas mean everything to them.  I wish it were not so but this is the world we live in.  These people will never stop until they get what they want or until they are forcibly removed from control of society.  

A Question about Sarkozy

In my previous post I said that world leaders are not independent leaders who represent the will of the people of their country but are chosen minions or puppets of a secret world establishment who are expected to obey what that hidden establishment wants the "world leader" to do.  The world leader has limited authority to do what they want within their own country as long as what they do does not conflict what the hidden establishment wants. Being a puppet does not mean that the Establishment controls every little action of the world leader but it does mean that the puppet is subservient to the will of the Establishment and will never go against that will. If any of these puppet world leaders want to do anything on their own, what they want to do is first vetted to ensure that it meets with the approval of their masters.  In effect, the world leader seeks permission first for anything he or she wants to do and only if it is approved will the world leader be allowed to do it.  Please understand that definition of puppet before I go on to discuss Sarkozy.

Nicolas Sarkozy, the former President of France, certainly was one of these puppet world leaders during the time of his Presidency,  May 2007 - May 2012.  One of the things that these puppet world leaders are expected to do is to give homage to their masters during public speaking appearances by making certain hand signs or giving certain hand shakes that indicate for everyone in the know that the person is merely a cog in a bigger organization and not an independent agent.  I discussed these hand signs and hand shakes in my post on Freemasonry.  Not to deviate too far away from the topic at hand, I want to make note of the inherent dual nature or duality of Freemasonry which directly reflects the Two Worlds Paradigm.  On the surface and to the general public Freemasonry appears to be one thing but hidden underneath and to those in the know Freemasonry is something completely different.  After taking a good hard look at what Freemasonry really is, it is my opinion that it is a front organization or agent for the secret world establishment. As an agent, it serves the secret world establishment but its only a front.  Those who identify Freemasonry as the source of anything have not realized this. Freemasonry is not the hidden hand that runs the world but is only a front.  It is my opinion that the real purpose of Freemasonry is to train individuals to be agents for the secret world establishment, with or without their knowledge.  

Nicolas Sarkozy has certainly been seen flashing his share of hand signs in public to show his masters that he is a loyal puppet to them, as evidenced by the following images.

Nicolas Sarkozy was recently found guilty of corruption by a Paris court and sentenced to jail time. See the below image and article.

Nicolas Sarkozy, Ex-President of France, Found Guilty of Corruption

I was asked a question about Sarkozy's conviction, which went something like this:

If Sarkozy is just a stooge for the Establishment as I have alleged then why would the Establishment allow him to be convicted and sent to jail?  Why wouldn't the Establishment protect its puppet?

From the tone of the question, I gathered that the person asking it does not believe that there is a hidden Establishment pulling the strings of these world leaders such as Sarkozy.  The questioner is using Sarkozy's conviction as a way to disprove a hidden Conspiracy to control the world and saying that the world works exactly as it appears and that guilty people no matter who they are will be brought to justice. 

I look past the implied skepticism of the questioner and just answer the question my way.  Sarkozy was indeed a puppet or minion to the Establishment while he was President of France but that does not mean he has lifetime protection from prosecution for criminal behavior, especially when that criminal behavior is noticed by the public and causes anger in the public. While the Establishment certainly would have protected him from prosecution while he was President, after he was no longer President there is no reason for them to continue to protect him.  As long as Sarkozy does not try to implicate anyone else in the secret world Establishment as being corrupt then the Establishment does not really care.  It has no loyalty to Sarkozy and no reason to defend him. He made his bed now let him lie in it.

I keep going back to the Two Worlds Paradigm because it really is the foundation for this.  The False World (or the world they want us to believe in) is a world where corruption matters, where truth matters, where justice matters.  People who are involved in corruption and other criminal behavior that comes to the attention of the public and especially that causes anger in the public must at least appear to be punished to maintain the illusion of a false world where corruption and criminal behavior is forbidden.  In other words, the prosecution of the corrupt or criminal minion is more of a show to pacify the mob's anger than actual justice.  

And this brings us to the similar case of Jeffrey Epstein, another corrupt minion of the Establishment whose criminal behavior came to the attention of the public. 

 At first Epstein, who is a Billionaire made a plea bargain where he did not have to go to jail at all.  This should be no surprise to anyone who has learned how the world really works.  It was not until Pizzagate exposed Jeffrey Epstein much stronger than his previous exposure and caused outrage among a lot of people, especially Trump supporters, who thought that what Jeffrey Epstein did demanded a long prison sentence, that there was a sudden change in his status.  It was not too much longer after that when Jeffrey Epstein was rearrested and this time he was not allowed to use his money and connections to stay out of jail.  Just as with the case of Sarkozy, what I contend is that the only reason that Epstein was sent to jail was to pacify the mob's anger and not because of justice.  So Epstein went to jail but to no surprise he did not stay in jail for long.  In the False world that (((they))) want you to believe, Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide and is dead.  Case closed.  Justice has been served.  If you believe that, I am so sorry to be the one to tell you that there is another world which has been hidden from your eyes.  In that hidden world, Jeffrey Epstein is alive.  Of course you will never see him again but he lives under a different identity.  Welcome to the World of the Real.

More to come