The Two Worlds Paradigm Example of James Paul McCartney

 

The Two Worlds Paradigm

False World Explanation:

James Paul McCartney (pictured above) was never portrayed by anyone but himself during his entire career in the Beatles and afterwards.

Real World Explanation:

Multiple people with a similiar facial appearance to James Paul McCartney portrayed him at various points in his career.

Introduction

I have made multiple posts on this blog about Paul being portrayed by multiple lookalikes but this is my first formal two worlds paradigm post about him specifically.

What annoys me to no end is the great mass of people in the world who I refer to as the braindead who believe whatever they are told and never question. What they are told is that Paul McCartney was never replaced even once in the Beatles or the alternate "conspiracy theory" that Paul died in 1966 and was replaced by a single lookalike known as Billy Shears or William Campbell or some other name. I have seen very few people say what I am saying instead, which is that James Paul McCartney was portrayed by multiple individuals with a similiar facial appearance. I do not say that Paul McCartney died. I do not say that the original Paul McCartney never returned. I do not say that the person claiming to be Paul McCartney now is not James Paul McCartney. What I do say and I have the clear photographic evidence to support the claim is that multiple indivduals were portraying themselves as Paul McCartney at various points in his career, especially from late 1966 through 1968.

Anomalies

Anomaly: Change of facial shape of a man claiming to be Paul McCartney.

Category: Lookalike

Description: In the above photograph on the left is Paul McCartney photographed in 1964 or 1965. The photograph on the right is also supposed to be Paul McCartney in 1967 or 1968. Notice the change of facial shape in the two photographs. In the left image Paul has a rounder face and in the right image Paul has a longer, more narrow face. 

Why it is an anomaly: Once a person becomes an adult their facial shape remains relatively constant. It does not change like this.

What the anomaly points to: That the man portraying Paul McCartney in the right image is not James Paul McCartney but a lookalike. Admittedly this is a very good lookalike that most people would not notice any difference from the original unless they carefully compared it with an earlier image of Paul McCartney with a difference face shape. 

Anomaly: Picture of a man alleged to be Paul McCartney who looks dramatically different than the original.

Category: Lookalike

Description: A man who is allegedly Paul McCartney was photographed with what is alleged to be the other three Beatles during the 1967 Sergeant Pepper era. 

Why it is an anomaly: This version of Paul McCartney looks nothing like the original.

What the anomaly points to: That the person portraying Paul McCartney in this image is a lookalike.

Anomaly: Dramatic change in height of Paul McCartney relative to Jane Asher.

Category: Lookalike

Description: Paul McCartney was photographed next to Jane Asher in 1964 or 1965 and at that time Paul was around 4 to six inches taller than her. A later photograph of Paul McCartney next to jane Asher shows him dramatically taller than she is. He appears to be up to twelve inches taller than she is.

Why it is an anomaly: If Paul McCartney was never replaced then his height would not dramatically change like this.

What the anomaly points to: That the "tall Paul" shown next to Jane Asher is not the original Paul but a much taller lookalike. It also indicates that Jane Asher was playing along with the substitution, for whatever reason.

Anomaly: The folded ear.

Category: Lookalike

Description: A person portraying themselves as Paul McCartney is seen with his ear folded behind his headphone but he is unaware of it.

Why it is an anomaly: If this person were really Paul McCartney he would certainly be aware that his ear was folded under his headphone.

What the anomaly points to: That this person is not Paul McCartney but a lookalike who is wearing prosthetic ears to disguise that his actual ears do not look like the original Paul McCartney's ears. The people behind this deception do not want photographic evidence to exist that proves a lookalike was portraying Paul McCartney in this instance so using prosthetic ears is the method they used.

Anomaly: A different fake Paul.

Category: Lookalike

Description: A person portraying himself as Paul McCartney is seen next to person who may or may not have been the real Brian Epstein.

Why it is an anomaly: Anyone with eyes to see can tell this is not James Paul McCartney and he is also different from the other lookalikes shown on this page.

What the anomaly points to: That a variety of lookalikes was used portray Paul McCartney, especially in 1967 and 1968.

More to come 

Why I hate Alex Jones

 One thing that angers me is to see someone making a reference to Alex Jones as if he is a legitimate truth teller. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Alex Jones is number one on my list of known disinformation agents. I have made other posts about Alex Jones here:

Putting My Money where my mouth is

Two Worlds Paradigm Example of Alex Jones

The Two Worlds Paradigm Example of the Sandy Hook School Shooting

More to come

The importance of Anomalies

In terms of this blog, an anomaly is a fact which is inconsistent with what most people consider to be true about a given subject. The anomaly does not fit with the general held belief about the subject. 

Anomalies are important because they point away from the lies the public has been told and is expected to believe to the forbidden truth. In a previous post where I introduced the topic of anomalies I said that Lies are exposed by anomalies. In terms of the two worlds paradigm, anomalies point away from the false world explanation to the real world explanation.

Much of this blog has been dedicated to exposing anomalies about various subjects but I do not think I have done an adequate job of exposing all of the known existing anomalies about some topics such as 9-11. My intention is to modify all of my two world paradigm posts with a section listing all known anomalies about the topic. This will undoubtedly be a very exhaustive task but for the sake of the truth I am willing to go to this effort. Even if nobody else cares about what I am doing here, I care enough about the truth in a world of lies to do it.

An index of posts about Jackie killing JFK

Introduction

One of the most important things I want to say on this Blog

How I became aware that Jackie shot JFK

What the Zapruder Film Shows

General posts about the assassination

The Two Worlds Paradigm Example of the JFK Assassination

The Two Worlds Paradigm Example of the JFK Assassination

JFK Assassination: Sequence of Events

Questions about the JFK Assassination

Common Questions about the JFK Assassination

Jackie specific posts

My accusation against Jackie Kennedy

Why I say Jackie Killed JFK

Jackie was a Ruthless Assassin

A closer look at the assassin of JFK

What Explains Jackie being the assassin?

An explanation for Jackie being the assassin of JFK

A Secret About Jackie Kennedy

Unmasking Jackie

Why I Contend that Jackie Kennedy was a Jew

Posts concerning the murder weapon

How was the Weapon Passed to Jackie?

How Jackie got rid of the Weapon

The Path of the Thrown Murder Weapon after it left Jackie's Hand

Jackie was not supposed to Throw the Weapon

Other relevant posts

The Real Purpose of the Grassy Knoll Shots

Miscellaneous Information related to Jackie Assassinating JFK

A New Thought About Jackie assassinating JFK

"Jackie Killed JFK" disinformation.

Texas Governor John Connally's role in the JFK Assassination

More Discussion of Jackie Assassinating JFK

The Replacement of Paul McCartney in the Beatles

Before I get into the meat of this post I want to answer a question that some viewers of this blog may want to ask, which is, why I am making yet another post about Paul McCartney and the Beatles? The answer is that it bothers me that the general public is being misled about what the truth is concerning this individual and that particular rock group. Whenever the truth is not known, I feel responsible for at least making an attempt to set the record straight.

This is not another PID post. I do not accept the PID version of events and there is so much disinformation involved in PID that I do not want to be associated with it in any way except to differentiate what I am saying is the truth from what PID says is the truth.

What PID says is the truth can be summarized as follows:

Paul McCartney died in late 1966 in a car accident in Britain and he was permanently replaced by a single individual sometimes referred to as Billy Shears or William Campbell or some other name. 

Far different from PID, what I am saying and have been saying on this Blog is the truth can be summarized as follows:

Paul McCartney was replaced in the Beatles in late 1966 either temporarily or permanently. During the time he was replaced there were numerous unknown lookalikes portraying him, not a single known individual as PID claims. These multiple lookalikes are all significantly different from each other and from the original Paul McCartney.

I have evidence to support what I say is the truth, which I have covered before in this blog but will be going over again later.

Before I go further, I want to raise a hypothetical question for your consideration, which is: If Paul was replaced in late 1966, either temporarily or permanently, then what explanations are available for him being replaced (or having to be replaced)? I have considered this question and here are some possible answers I came up with.

An illness, either temporary of permanent.

A non fatal accident that was disfiguring.

He died, either by natural causes or unnatural causes (ie murder/assassination).

He wanted leave the Beatles voluntarily, either temporarily or permanently without destroying the group in the process.

He was forced to leave the Beatles for an unknown reason.

Are there any other possible explanations you can think of?

Going forward in this post I will refer to the original James Paul McCartney as JPM to distinguish him from any lookalikes.

Here is some information from the PID movement that I hold to be true:

In mid September 1966 JPM was missing from media coverage for months without explanation.

When he supposedly reappeared in mid-December 1966 he appeared in all ways to be very different than he had been before.

Relevant to this discussion is that JPM allegedly left the UK wearing a disguise to vacation in France incognito so he would not be swarmed by fans.

Following this vacation in France JPM allegedly went to Africa to vacation.

I will be showing photographs in this post to show the changes in the appearance of JPM as evidence that JPM did not arrive in France, although his car did, driven by a lookalike and that he did not go to Africa either. A lookalike did. This is the beginning of the deception.

The original JPM appeared on the Melody Makers Award Show in London on September 13, 1966. Here is an image of JPM at that show: 

Note his appearance and how he appears to look as he always looked in the Beatles. Nobody would doubt this is JPM. This image is the last public appearance from JPM for months until he allegedly wanted to vacation incognito in France by wearing a disguise so he would not be recognized as a Beatle, which would ruin his vacation. Its perfectly understandable why he would want to do this and it makes sense but there is something wrong with the photographs, as you will see.

Below right is the picture of JPM taken in the UK in disguise before he went to France. Compared with the image on the below left we can still recognize that this is JPM. The mustache, glasses and change of hair style do not change his appearance so much that he cannot be recognized. 

It has been said that on November 6, Paul flew to France on a plane ferry with his Aston Martin from Lydd Airport in Kent, England but there is a problem with this date. As you can see from the following image, the picture of Paul in disguise shown above was taken on October 28. 1966.

It is illogical to think that Paul would be dressed up in disguise on October 28 and then not go to France wearing the disguse until November 6. It is far more likely that Paul flew to France on the same day his picture in disguise was taken, October 28, 1966. 

It has been said that Paul drove to Paris, then down to Bordeaux, where he planned to meet his roadie, Mal Evans, on November 12 but we cannot trust this to be accurate.  I question if JPM ever drove to Paris or was even in France but I say a lookalike was in France. Also the date of November 12 is in question based upon the above date inaccuracy. In regard to Mal Evans, if there was indeed a conspiracy to switch JPM with a lookalike then Mal Evans was certainly a part of that. 

The next image of what is alleged to be JPM is taken in France driving Paul's car, but this person with Paul's car was not JPM. It was a lookalike. It was the first of many lookalikes, as I will be showing with photographic evidence.

A real life Texas switch

A Texas Switch is a classic filmmaking trick where an actor, stunt double or prop is seamlessly swapped out mid-shot without cutting the camera. This is the Hollywood version of a Texas switch but in the real world which this blog is concerned with, a Texas switch is when a person, usually a VIP is substituted with a lookalike without letting the public know about it. The public considers the lookalike to be the VIP in the absence of anything to make them suspicious.

In the case of Paul's "incognito" vacation to France, he was replaced by a lookalike who was driving JPM's car, a dark green Aston Martin DB5.

The below images were supposedly taken in France of Paul with his DB5.

I don't know how perceptive you are in comparing people in photographs but there is no doubt in my mind that the person seen standing beside JPM's DB5 is not JPM.

The person in this image is taller and gaunter than JPM. His head is less round and more oblong. If you are not convinced I have later images to show you of this man when he went to Africa a short time later. These images show very clearly that a substitution has been made of JPM for a lookalike that doesn't remotely look like Paul.

More to Come if you want it.

The Lost Connection between Jeffrey Epstein and Israel

One of the many things that infuriate me is that almost nobody in America associates the activities of Jeffrey Epstein with Israel, as if there was no connection between them at all. In reality there is a very important connection but because it is never mentioned by the Jew controlled American MSM, the vast majority of the American public does not know about it.  In fact, the majority of Americans do not even know Jeffrey Epstein is Jewish once more because the American MSM never told them that even once. Its very sad to me to see a gullible brainwashed population fucked over again and again using their own ignorance. What can I do if anything to change this? I don't know but creating a post about it here is a good start since I see virtually nobody even discussing this on any media I have looked at.

Getting more specific, the American public has been fed the lie that everything Epstein did he did for himself and his personal friends. Israel isn't even on the radar.  We know who benefits from this misinformation.

The MSM across the board describes Epstein as "a convicted sex offender" instead of "Israel's puppet", which is a much more accurate definition. As a truth seeker and truth teller it is my responsibility to do what the main stream media will never do: tell the antisemitic truth. If you don't what the antisemitic truth means, it is truth that sheds unfavorably light on Israel and on Jews in general. Antisemitic truth is never told on Jew controlled media but this entire blog is full of it. That is probably the reason my Blog, even though hosted on a Google server is blacklisted by Google search engine. Since the majority of the clueless public trusts the Google search engine that manipulates them and spies on everything they do using it, most Americans will never see this Blog. So be it. The truth is not for everyone.

If you search for this subject on the internet as I did you will be frustrated with the results. Although some say there is suspicion that Epstein had ties to Israeli intelligence, it seems that is as far as anyone is willing to go. If you believe the search results is all there is then you would come away with the predetermined conclusion that there were no ties at all and its all antisemitic smoke and mirrors to purposely defame Israel by associating him with this notorious man.  That is what (((they))) want you to believe. You know how they operate or you should know.

Few on the internet have the courage to tell this antisemitic truth. What follows is a list of links that attempt to actually show the connection instead of just saying suspected connections. These are not fully vetted for disinformation so use your own discretion when reading.

Jeffrey Epstein was working for Israel since 1980s

From Leaks to Files: The Undeniable Proof Jeffrey Epstein Served Israeli Interests – And Why the Press Blames Everyone Else

Former Spy Details Israel’s Main Motive Behind Epstein’s Sexual Blackmail Operation

The Epstein-Israel link nobody wants you to take seriously Retrieved from the wayback machine

Mossad Used Jeffrey Epstein to Blackmail Politicians, Former Israeli Spy Claims

The Epstein Files completely ignore the child trafficker’s links to Israeli military intelligence

Jeffrey Epstein was blackmailing politicians for Israel’s Mossad, new book claims

More to come if you want it

Were the Beatles a product of the UK Tavistock Institute?

As a truth seeker and a long time fan of the Beatles, one thing I have been interested in is answering the question: Were the Beatles a product of the UK Tavistock Institute? Of all the conspiracy talk about the Beatles on the internet, one of the claims is that this group was not a naturally occurring phenomenon but was instead created by the Tavistock Institute to influence the masses in America and the whole world. In this post I am going to be investigating this claim.  What evidence exists, if any to indicate it could be true?

It has been said that not just the Beatles but many other rock groups and perhaps the entire British invasion was a Tavistock creation. I do not know the truth about this but I am very curious to find out. This post is limited in scope to just the Beatles.

In terms of the Beatles, it has been said that they had their music and lyrics written for them by a Jewish man named Theo Adorno, pictured above. He was a prominent member of the Tavistock Institute. I have personally seen one or more images of this man playing instruments for the Beatles as they recorded their albums, so that is significant on its face but does not indicate a conspiracy without a lot of other addional evidence.

John Coleman, a former MI6 agent has been quoted as saying: 

“The fact that “The Beatles” had their music and lyrics written for them by Theo Adorno was concealed from public view.”

While researching this topic I have found it is difficult to get a straight answer. Most internet sites discussing it make the claim and give no evidence and immediately start talking about Satanism, mind control and other red herrings. In this post I am not doing that. My only intent here is to attempt to establish evidence that the Tavistock Institute was involved in the creation and later world-wide fame of the Beatles. Nothing more. So if you want salacious gossip, go elsewhere.

First we should discuss that Tavistock Institute itself and what it really is and what it really does. The Tavistock Institute of Public Relations based in the UK is a branch of MI-6, the British Secret Service.  Tavistock is an intelligence-related organization that attempts to influence public thinking and public behavior in a way that is desirable to those in authority in the UK and beyond the UK. 

The following link is for a PDF that provides a good expose of what the Tavistock Institute is really about.  Its a long read containing a lot of information but this shows how Jews exert control on the world in secret using front organizations.  The front organization conceals the Jewish hidden hand.  Jews love to control in secret and this how they do it. 

The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations

From this PDF, noteworthy concerning the Beatles is:

Tavistock graduate Theo Adorno, whose 12-atonal discords were scientifically pitched to create mass "environmental social turbulences" all across America, wrote the music for the Beatles. None of the Beatles could read (much less write) music. Nevertheless, they were "puffed" day and night without ceasing until everything about them, - lies and all, was accepted as truth.

What follows is a link to a Youtube video giving John Coleman's account of the Beatles being a Tavistock project:

The creation of The Beatles: John Coleman on Adorno and Tavistock

These are the claims of one man but I am looking for evidence to support this. Unless such evidence can be found then IMO it is not true. 

More to come if you want it