Stranger in a Jewish World

Thursday, August 27, 2026

Were the Beatles a product of the UK Tavistock Institute?

As a truth seeker and a long time fan of the Beatles, one thing I have been interested in is answering the question: Were the Beatles a product of the UK Tavistock Institute? Of all the conspiracy talk about the Beatles on the internet, one of the claims is that this group was not a naturally occurring phenomenon but was instead created by the Tavistock Institute to influence the masses in America and the whole world. In this post I am going to be investigating this claim. What evidence exists, if any to indicate it could be true?

It has been said that not just the Beatles but many other rock groups and perhaps the entire British invasion was a Tavistock creation. I do not know the truth about this but I am very curious to find out. This post is limited in scope to just the Beatles.

In terms of the Beatles, it has been said that they had their music and lyrics written for them by a Jewish man named Theo Adorno, pictured above. He was a prominent member of the Tavistock Institute. I have personally seen one or more images of this man playing instruments for the Beatles as they recorded their albums, so that is significant on its face but does not indicate a conspiracy without a lot of other addional evidence.

John Coleman, a former MI6 agent has been quoted as saying:

“The fact that “The Beatles” had their music and lyrics written for them by Theo Adorno was concealed from public view.”

While researching this topic I have found it is difficult to get a straight answer. Most internet sites discussing it make the claim and give no evidence and immediately start talking about Satanism, mind control and other red herrings. In this post I am not doing that. My only intent here is to attempt to establish evidence that the Tavistock Institute was involved in the creation and later world-wide fame of the Beatles. Nothing more. So if you want salacious gossip, go elsewhere.

First we should discuss that Tavistock Institute itself and what it really is and what it really does. The Tavistock Institute of Public Relations based in the UK is a branch of MI-6, the British Secret Service. Tavistock is an intelligence-related organization that attempts to influence public thinking and public behavior in a way that is desirable to those in authority in the UK and beyond the UK.

The following link is for a PDF that provides a good expose of what the Tavistock Institute is really about. Its a long read containing a lot of information but this shows how Jews exert control on the world in secret using front organizations. The front organization conceals the Jewish hidden hand. Jews love to control in secret and this how they do it.

The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations

From this PDF, noteworthy concerning the Beatles is:

Tavistock graduate Theo Adorno, whose 12-atonal discords were scientifically pitched to create mass "environmental social turbulences" all across America, wrote the music for the Beatles. None of the Beatles could read (much less write) music. Nevertheless, they were "puffed" day and night without ceasing until everything about them, - lies and all, was accepted as truth.

What follows is a link to a Youtube video giving John Coleman's account of the Beatles being a Tavistock project:

The creation of The Beatles: John Coleman on Adorno and Tavistock

These are the claims of one man but I am looking for evidence to support this. Unless such evidence can be found then IMO it is not true.

More to come if you want it

Wednesday, August 26, 2026

What caused the plane shaped holes?

This post is about what caused the plane shaped holes in the twin towers. Now, if you are the typical American sheep (and I hope you are not), your automatic thought will be: "Duh. The planes crashing into the buildings caused them. What else?". If you think this, its not really your fault because you have been conditioned by the main stream media and the U.S. Government not to apply any critical thinking skills to anything that happened on 9-11-2001 or appeared to happen on that date.

There are many unthinking people whose brains are not wired to question any narrative that appears to be accepted by the herd. I would say that the majority of people fit in this category. For them, WYSIWYG. Thankfully not all Americans are so simple minded to believe this. The fact is that the U.S. Government and main stream media are dishonest and routinely lie to the American people. The blue pilled cannot accept that but the red pilled have seen many many examples of it. Once you accept the inherent dishonesty of these "trusted" institutions then you have the proper mindset to see and understand hidden truths.

There is a problem of logic concerning these holes which I am about to elucidate. Before I do I want to show a video clip of how the main stream media wants you to believe both of these holes were created.

What this image appears to show is an aluminum plane going through the steel outer frame of this building (the south tower of the WTC complex) as if the exterior of the building offered no physical resistance to the plane as it "entered" and later apparently caused the huge "shock and awe" fireball in the interior. The fireball and what caused it are a different subject. What we are concerned about here is the feasibility of an aluminum plane doing what is shown here and leaving these apparent plane shaped holes that even include the wings of the plane that are so fragile that they cannot even be walked on without collapsing. In this image even those fragile wings go through the exterior of the building and leave their apparent shape as a jagged hole later.

In the real world when an aluminum plane impacts something solid there is incredible damage to the plane. For example, in the below image this plane struck a bird (or the bird struck the plane). Either way just a single bird that is a fraction of the hardness of the steel beams surrounding the WTC buildings did this damage. It does such damage because the plane is hollow and not a rigid steel structure. It does not take a lot to damage it in an impact scenario.

Imagine if this same plane had slammed into the face of the South tower. What do you think would have happened? Would this plane just go through the exterior or it would the plane have been obliterated with relatively minor damage to the building, even if the plane was going 500 miles per hour? You know the answer to that question. The entire plane would be destroyed immediately upon impact. It would not go through the steel exterior of the building as if the steel exterior did not even exist. Anyone can see this.

So there is a problem of simple logic with the explanation that planes caused these holes. How could two Boeing 767 jetliners, which are essentially big hollow aluminum tubes, cut through multiple steel girders and concrete floors to completely penetrate the massive steel towers, with no deceleration visible, and disappear without a trace, with no plane wreckage visible in the holes and no wreckage fall to the ground below the impact zone? It is a physical impossibility.

Above is an image of the plane shaped hole in WTC 1 allegedly caused by Flight 11. Certainly it looks like this hole was caused by a plane impacting the building, penetrating it and going inside it with no signs of any part of the plane on the outside. No aluminum wrapped around the steel columns is seen. In fact nothing of the plane is seen except the hole that appears to be plane shaped.

This post is to attempt to answer this question: If physical planes did not create these holes then what alternate explanation(s) are there for their existence or apparent existence. I use the word apparent because not everything that appears to be real that is shown on the television news is actually real. Do you need examples of this? Many such cases.

More to Come if you want it

Tuesday, August 25, 2026

Beverly Eckert

Despite what some may have thought, I am still maintaining this Blog. This particular post is about a woman named Beverly Eckert, who came up on my radar as a suspicious death related to 9-11. Of course for those who do not think there was any conspiracy involved in 9-11 the death of this woman is just a coincidental nothingburger. Nothing to see here. Move along. Obviously I am not one of those people which is why I am taking the time and trouble to make this post.

What makes Beverly Eckert significant in my opinion is that she refused to accept what amounts to a cash bribe to drop her investigation(s) into 9-11 and later died in a "plane accident". That got my attention that her death may have been a way to silence her by those people who have a lot to lose if the truth about 9-11 is ever released to the American public instead of the Zionist fairy tale we were sold by our faithful American media.

Here is some specific information about Beverly Eckert that I want to share. She became a member of the Family Steering Committee, the group of relatives who in 2002 and 2003 spearheaded the public fight for a 9/11 commission, against resistance from the White House. Beverly Eckert was also among a handful of Sept. 11th relatives to reject the rich settlements offered by the government in exchange for a renunciation of all legal claims against US persons or entities, such as corporations or government agencies. She participated in a number of lawsuits around Sept 11th, with the express purpose of gaining discovery and accountability about the events of the day. She wasn't a sheep, as so many Americans are when the subject concerns 9-11.

As the deadline for filing claims with the Victims’ Compensation Fund passed in Dec. 2003, she published the following statement in USA Today:

My Silence Cannot Be Bought by Beverly Eckert

I’ve chosen to go to court rather than accept a payoff from the 9/11 victims compensation fund. Instead, I want to know what went so wrong with our intelligence and security systems that a band of religious fanatics was able to turn four U.S passenger jets into an enemy force, attack our cities and kill 3,000 civilians with terrifying ease. I want to know why two 110-story skyscrapers collapsed in less than two hours and why escape and rescue options were so limited.

I am suing because unlike other investigative avenues, including congressional hearings and the 9/11 commission, my lawsuit requires all testimony be given under oath and fully uses powers to compel evidence.

The victims fund was not created in a spirit of compassion. Rather, it was a tacit acknowledgement by Congress that it tampered with our civil justice system in an unprecedented way. Lawmakers capped the liability of the airlines at the behest of lobbyists who descended on Washington while the Sept. 11 fires still smoldered.

And this liability cap protects not just the airlines, but also World Trade Center builders, safety engineers and other defendants.

The caps on liability have consequences for those who want to sue to shed light on the mistakes of 9/11. It means the playing field is tilted steeply in favor of those who need to be held accountable. With the financial consequences other than insurance proceeds removed, there is no incentive for those whose negligence contributed to the death toll to acknowledge their failings or implement reforms. They can afford to deny culpability and play a waiting game.

By suing, I’ve forfeited the “$1.8 million average award” for a death claim I could have collected under the fund. Nor do I have any illusions about winning money in my suit. What I do know is I owe it to my husband, whose death I believe could have been avoided, to see that all of those responsible are held accountable. If we don’t get answers to what went wrong, there will be a next time. And instead of 3,000 dead, it will be 10,000. What will Congress do then?

So I say to Congress, big business and everyone who conspired to divert attention from government and private-sector failures: My husband’s life was priceless, and I will not let his death be meaningless. My silence cannot be bought.

If I were to venture a guess I would say that this is what sealed her fate and destined her for a later convenient plane crash to take her out of the picture. I guess she could have committed suicide also but that might have been harder to accept. Anything to get rid of her and her troublesome questions that the U.S. Government had no good answer for.

As for the plane crash in which she died in, what is significant is that she had met with then President Obama in Washington, D.C. to discuss 9-11 and to ask the President to open a new 9-11 investigation. Apparently she didn't know that this was a no-no, as Dennis Kucinich and his family found out the hard way when the U.S. Senator called for a new 9-11 investigation. It took having two family members murdered to make Mr. Kucinich stop talking about 9-11. This is a third rail that powerful people do not want touched by anyone.

Less than a week after meeting with Obama she was dead. Someone who had involvement in 9-11 such as the CIA (or Israel) may have thought it was time to silence this bothersome woman for good. Let the sheep learn to keep their mouths shut and just accept whatever the U.S. Government says is true. There is no need for an inquiry into anything. Just accept what you or told and given in pay off money and move on, for the good of the country, of course.

Although the media presented the cause of the crash as nothing more sinister than ice build-up on the wings of the plane, suspiciously there was a strong FBI presence at the crash site. The FBI only investigates cases where the NTSB has determined that ‘foul play’ is involved. This suggests that something other than ice buildup caused the crash of the plane and the U.S. Government covered it up for its own purposes.

More to come if you want it.