Planes vs. No Planes used on 9-11

According to the official explanation, four planes full of passengers were hijacked on the morning of 9-11-2001 and these were used in a terrorist attack on America. These four planes are listed below.

1. American Airlines Flight 11 allegedly flow into the North Tower.

2. United Airlines Flight 175 allegedly flew into the South Tower.

3. American Airlines Flight 77 allegedly crashed into the Pentagon.

4. United Airlines Flight 93 allegedly crashed into an empty field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

The purpose of this post is to discuss whether there were any real planes used during the 9-11 PSYOP.

Flight 11 (North Tower)

Regarding Flight 11 that allegedly crashed into the North Tower, there is no photographic evidence of a plane being seen hitting the North Tower. There are alleged witnesses who claim they saw a plane hit the tower but these "witnesses" are members of the Main Stream Media and George W. Bush, dishonest people who would easily lie to support a deception. There was an explosion at the top of the North Tower but this could have easily been made by pre-planted explosives inside the building and not caused by a plane hitting it.  There is what appears to be a plane shaped hole on the side of the building where the plane allegedly hit but this could have been caused by carefully placed shape charges on that side of the building to simulate a plane-shaped hole.  It is my contention that no plane crashed into the North tower and everything that makes it appear that a real plane caused the damage is deception.

Flight 175 (South Tower)

This is the only case where a real plane could have been used. I will save discussion of this for later in this post.

Flight 77 (Pentagon)

Regarding Flight 77 that allegedly crashed into the side of the Pentagon, there is no photographic evidence of a plane hitting the Pentagon. Any such evidence that could have been seen was seized by the FBI and never released to the public. There is at least one alleged witness who claims he saw a plane hit the Pentagon but he is member of the dishonest Mainstream media who would easily lie to support a deception.  There are apparently honest witnesses who saw a large plane approaching the Pentagon but they did not see it hit the Pentagon. That plane apparently flew over the Pentagon synchronized with the explosion. There was an explosion inside the Pentagon that could have been caused by pre-planted explosives inside the Pentagon and not a plane.  The damage to the Pentagon could have been caused by a U.S. cruise missile and not a plane. There were apparent small bits of wreckage scattered on the lawn of the Pentagon but these could have easily been spread in advance of the alleged plane hit and be 100% deception. It is my contention that no plane crashed into the Pentagon and everything that makes it appear that a real plane caused the damage is deception.

Flight 93 (Shanksville)

Regarding Flight 93 that allegedly crashed into the field in Shanksville, PA, there was no evidence of a plane crash at the site. No plane wreckage and no bodies. There was a smoking hole in the ground that the plane allegedly made when it hit but this hole pre-existed the alleged crash. It is my contention that no plane crashed into the field in Shanksville, PA. and everything that makes it appear that a real plane caused the damage is deception. 

A deeper analysis of the South Tower "plane"

What I say here is entirely my opinion based upon my examination of the entirely of 9-11 which I view to be a PSYOP.

From the point of view of the Conspirators of the PSYOP it would make sense to use at least one real plane that was close in appearance to a United Airlines passenger plane, seen by multiple eye witnesses in New York City, to support the official explanation of four hijacked passenger planes being used in a terrorist attack against America. If I were planning a deception like this that I wanted people to believe was not a deception then I would use at least one real plane and lie about the other three planes.

But the problem with using a real plane is that it would not provide the shock and awe of a horrific terrorist attack against America that the Conspirators were trying to show. The real plane would slam into the face of the South Tower and disintegrate upon impact. Most or all of the plane would fall to the ground outside of the building. It would not penetrate it and cause the massive fireball that was seen on the main stream media.

Apparently the "real plane" seen by multiple eye witnesses was an illusion that morphed into the fake plane that penetrated the side of the South Tower as if it were butter. How this illusion was accomplished is a matter of debate. Some claim that advanced military technology was used to cause the Hologram of a plane to appear around a missile. From the outside it appeared to be a plane but in reality it was a missile projecting a hologram of a plane all around it in 3D. This is a possibility.

Others claim there was a never a plane and it was just CGI inserted into film to deceive. But if there were so then how do we explain all the eye witnesses who saw what appeared to be a plane flying toward the South Tower?

There may be other explanations besides these, but it is my contention that a real plane was not used to strike the South Tower because no plane could have penetrated it without being destroyed upon impact.