The Paul on the left is from 65, the Paul on the right is from 67.
The man on the right is an imposter who has been made to look similar to the original Paul but anyone with eyes can see its not the same man. The person they chose already had some similar facial features but there has been surgical work done on his eyes to make them match the shape of the original Paul's eyes.
The ears do not match up. The bottom of the ear (which is an artificial ear) is much too low on the right.
The reason the Beatles grew mustaches is to make it less obvious that Paul was replaced. The mustaches all made them look different.
People who say Paul and Faul miss the point. There was never one single substitute playing Paul in late 66 on. It was multiple people. Very obviously there were multiple imposters but they improved on the look later on, so much so that it looks like the original Paul came back. I don't think that is so. I really do think the original Paul died in 66, however that really happened. The Beatles was such a profitable group with the backing of the Royal Family, it makes perfect sense that they would find a look a like to keep the Beatles going even if one of the original members was no longer around.
In the above image we see another look a like for Paul, which is NOT the same one as in the above image, which demonstrates that they had multiple look a likes for Paul. Its not accurate to say Faul but it is to say Fauls.
A different Paul look a like.
Never cared for them much in the first place.
ReplyDeleteThey had no roots in the blues, their roots were 50s schmaltz/pop. Like my bro said, "guys liked the stones, chicks liked the beatles." Young girls (the not so bright ones) like feminine men, who knows why?
Thank god Zeppelin came around and like Ozzy said, music was changed forever. Cream was also great. But if it weren't for the Dead, music would be sterile without improvisation, aside from Jazz which bores me. Real guitarists learn the scales first, they don't "learn songs".
The point I am trying to make is that there was artificiality in the Beatles. Many others have pointed this out also. My objection to the Beatles is that they were an Establishment created group that pretended not to be.
Delete