Recent research has revealed a new epiphany about Jackie's role as the assassin in the JFK Assassination. Its taken me a long time to see this picture clearly. Today I think I see it more clearly than ever before. Here is the epiphany which is being exposed in other threads of this Blog.
Jacqueline Bouvier was involved in sexual espionage and entrapment (Blackmail) before she met JFK. She was a deep cover agent who was well paid for her services to spy on and entrap high profile men. It was her job and she enjoyed it. I am purposely not discussing who she worked for yet. I am just saying what she did.
John F. Kennedy was not her first target. There were others before him but none as important as John F. Kennedy. When she first met JFK, she was introduced to him by someone who was another agent. In other words, she was purposely set up with JFK TO spy on him and entrap him by his enemies and/or by those who wanted to keep a close watch on him.
She was an agent after she became romantically involved with JFK and before she married him.
She was an agent during her marriage to JFK before he became POTUS. For example, when he became U.S. Senator from New York. All during this time she was secretly spying on him and reporting his activities and anything else she saw and heard to secret contacts.
She was an agent during her marriage to JFK after he became POTUS. All during this time of his Presidency, she was secretly spying on him and reporting his activities and anything else she saw and heard to secret contacts.
In 1963 the Dimona affair generated a plot to assassinate JFK and to replace him with LBJ. This plot originated in Israel. It was handed to the Mossad to implement. The CIA and the Mossad are in bed together. The CIA certainly knew that Jackie was a deep cover agent because she had been doing assignments for the CIA from the early 1950's before she even met JFK. But I suspect that Jackie was not just working for the CIA but also possibly for the KGB and the Mossad. Whoever would pay her is who she worked for. She had no real loyalties except for her own personal greed.
But here was this embedded deep cover agent who was already spying on her husband for possibly multiple intelligence agencies. Even though she was married to JFK and had kids by him, her true loyalty was NEVER to her husband. She did not love him. It was just a job to her for which she was very well paid by her employers. She was not an assassin but she was a sexual spy.
A very highly placed sexual spy who became First Lady of the United States.
So when the need to kill JFK over Dimona suddenly presented itself, she was the perfect choice as the assassin. She did not love her husband. She married him just to spy on him. She had no true love or loyalty for him beyond her job description. So to get her to kill her husband for them, all (((they))) had to do was to offer her a big enough financial incentive to do so and she would do it. She left the U.S. in 1963 and went overseas, during which time I believe she was fully briefed about an assassination plan. I think she was trained to assassinate during this time.
The people who wanted JFK dead did not have to kill him. All they had to do was to help his wife kill him and that is what we see in the Abraham Zapruder film. We see that a lot of people including the Governor of Texas helped Jackie to kill her husband. And then they covered up what she did and put all the blame on Oswald. And the American public bought the lie almost 100%. Until now.
This is the best explanation for me to understand the GIF image shown at the top of this post. It shows a woman with no true feelings for her husband assassinating him because others want JFK dead and were willing to pay HER a lot of money to do it. I am sure a lot of money was paid to her secretly in addition to her marriage to Aristotle Onassis approximately five years after she killed her husband. She got a double pay off. Her biggest payoff was getting to spend the rest of her life in complete luxury married to the richest man in the world.
Of all the explanations I have had for her role as the assassin, to me this explains it best. To me this is as close to the truth as I can see.
No comments:
Post a Comment